-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update helm test #229
update helm test #229
Conversation
Signed-off-by: cpanato <[email protected]>
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, harshanarayana The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ func TestHelmChartRepoWorkflow(t *testing.T) { | |||
Assess("Deployment is running successfully", func(ctx context.Context, t *testing.T, config *envconf.Config) context.Context { | |||
deployment := &appsv1.Deployment{ | |||
ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{ | |||
Name: "nginx-nginx-ingress", | |||
Name: "nginx-nginx-ingress-controller", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vladimirvivien should we have a dedicated chart pushed to the helm registry that is just meant for our test and use that instead in order to avoid failures like this one for example in the future ?
cc @cpanato
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sounds good, i can do that if you all want
@cpanato & @harshanarayana thanks for an awesome job!! |
Fixes: #228
/assign @vladimirvivien @ShwethaKumbla @harshanarayana